Determinan Jumlah Pinjaman Internasional pada Pembiayaan Infrastruktur Ketenagalistrikan: Pendekatan Panel Dinamis

Authors

  • Ignatius Aryo Adiwoso PT PLN Persero, Indonesia
  • Bambang Eko Afiatno Program Studi Magister Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62337/jsse.v4i2.107

Keywords:

International Loans, System GMM, Funding Gap, Environmental Framework, Green Project, Electricity Infrastructure Financing

Abstract

This study analyzed the determinants of international loan amounts for electricity infrastructure financing over a two-decade period. Economic factors were represented by lagged international loan amount and funding gap, while environmental factors were represented by the environmental framework of international lending institutions and green project status. The study applied a quantitative explanatory approach using an unbalanced panel dataset derived from electricity infrastructure financing agreements and supporting documents. The empirical model used a dynamic panel approach estimated through System Generalized Method of Moments. The results showed that lagged loan had a positive and significant effect on current international loan amount. Funding gap also had a positive and significant effect, indicating that financing needs were an important determinant of international borrowing. The environmental framework had a positive but statistically insignificant effect, while green project status had a negative and weakly significant effect. These findings suggested that international electricity-infrastructure financing was driven more by previous financing dynamics and actual funding needs than by environmental factors directly. The findings underlined the importance of aligning investment planning, financing needs, and green or blended-finance instruments to support effective and bankable energy-transition financing

References

Adamolekun, G. (2024). Firm biodiversity risk, climate vulnerabilities, and bankruptcy risk. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 97, 102075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102075

Agoraki, K. K., Giaka, M., Konstantios, D., & Negkakis, I. (2024). The relationship between firm-level climate change exposure, financial integration, cost of capital and investment efficiency. Journal of International Money and Finance, 141, 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2023.102994

Ahmad, M. F., & Karpuz, A. (2024). Beyond climate change risk: Biodiversity and corporate cash holdings. Economics Letters, 236, 111608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111608

Alam, M. S., Safiullah, M., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Cash-rich firms and carbon emissions. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102106

Ali, R., García-Sánchez, I. M., Aibar-Guzmán, B., & Rehman, R. U. (2024). Is biodiversity disclosure emerging as a key topic on the agenda of institutional investors? Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3587

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Azar, J., Duro, M., Kadach, I., & Ormazabal, G. (2021). The Big Three and corporate carbon emissions around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.007

Bassen, A., Buchholz, D., Lopatta, K., & Rudolf, A. R. (2024). Biodiversity management and stock price crash risk. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3725

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008

Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2023). Global pricing of carbon-transition risk. The Journal of Finance, 78(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13272

Di Tommaso, C., Foglia, M., & Pacelli, V. (2025). The impact of biodiversity score on the European firm’s performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 106, 104460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104460

Flammer, C., Giroux, T., & Heal, G. M. (2025). Biodiversity finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 164, 103987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103987

Ghosh, S. (2023). Does climate legislation matter for bank lending? Evidence from MENA countries. Ecological Economics, 212, 107923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107923

Huang, H. H., Kerstein, J., Wang, C., & Wu, F. (2022). Firm climate risk, risk management, and bank loan financing. Strategic Management Journal, 43(13). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3437

Kedward, K., Ryan-Collins, J., & Chenet, H. (2023). Biodiversity loss and climate change interactions: Financial stability implications for central banks and financial supervisors. Climate Policy, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2107475

Konadu, R., Ahinful, G. S., Boakye, D. J., & Elbardan, H. (2022). Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279

Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137

Li, J., Jin, Y., & Zhou, P. (2025). Do banks price firms’ biodiversity risk? Evidence from the Kunming declaration. International Review of Financial Analysis, 106, 104557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104557

Li, Q., Shan, H., Tang, Y., & Yao, V. (2024). Corporate climate risk: Measurements and responses. The Review of Financial Studies, 37(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhad094

Pankratz, N., Bauer, R., & Derwall, J. (2023). Climate change, firm performance, and investor surprises. Management Science, 69(12). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4685

Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x

Safiullah, M., Alam, M. S., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Do all institutional investors care about corporate carbon emissions? Energy Economics, 115, 106376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106376

Sautner, Z., Van Lent, L., Vilkov, G., & Zhang, R. (2023). Firm-level climate change exposure. The Journal of Finance, 78(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13219

Yu, M., Si, Y., Tian, G., & Zhang, L. (2023). Climate risk and audit fees: An international study. Accounting & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13108

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check